VST in Pro Tools 10 & 11! The Blue Cat Patchwork.aax plug-in is allowing me to use many of these plugs from Computer Magazine and other cool VST plugs like my Sknote plugs, wow. Any other tips for me? Anyone else on PT HD10 got this SpiralCM aax plug-in working? It takes some time to VET all of these plugs, but there are some pretty great ones, I must say.
#PHOTOSOUNDER SPLINE EQ DRIVERS#
I tried unlocking the permissions on the file to 'read & write' for all, no change.Įverything else is working fine and my ilok drivers and such are all up to date. I'm getting the 'could not be authorized' on HD Accel 10.3.8 on Lion 10.7.5 on my Mac Pro for the cool plug SpiralCM.aax from the Photosounder folks.
#PHOTOSOUNDER SPLINE EQ TRIAL#
If you're totally skinned you could even cancel during your trial and pay nothing, but CM is a pretty good read. Just starting a trial iOS subscription to the magazine allows you to get these plugs from their VAULT website. 2014 freeze out' and I have to say that nearly all of the 26 free plug-ins that you get from a Computer Magazine subscription are pretty awesome. Glad I went through the exercise.So I'm 'cleaning house' here in Ohio due to the 'Jan. Generally, the linear phase pairs sounded better: the non-linear pairs had a sort of tweaked or phasey sound to them in comparison - nothing I would have been bothered by ordinarily, and totally usable, but the linear pairs were more natural sounding, presumably because the steep bass rolloff wasn't phase shfiting in the midrange and causing that range to push to one side or the other, in addition to whatever was happening from the other curves.įascinating stuff. ReaFIR and SplineEQ also sounded very close (ReaFIR wasn't having as much effect on the low end of the side channel for unknown reasons, and as a result wasn't tightening the stereo image in the low end quite as much.) Corroborating the theory that it is due to the type of eq, I couldn't tell the difference between Alloy 2 and ReaEQ. phase), a pair of Photosounder SplineEQ (linear phase), and a pair of ReaFIRs (linear phase when "reduce artifacts" is enabled), and dialed an ~identical curve into all of them: I steeply high-passed the side at around 220Hz, high-shelfed the side about 2.8dB from about 2k, and boosted the mid channel about 1.5dB around 250Hz (wide Q).Īs advertised, there was a significant difference between the linear vs. phase), I also inserted a pair of ReaEQ (min. My generic M/S effect chain encodes into MS, has a multi-effect for mid and side (two instances of iZotope Alloy 2, set up via pin routing), and decodes to stereo. Thought I'd share, in case it's interesting to anyone. so I pulled up some mid/side tracks (I record nearly all single sources in mid/side) and did some experimenting. top/bottom snare) the phase changes cause regional canceling or boosting, but still. With mid/side it's a slightly different issue, since phase changes in the "side" channel effect the stereo location of a sound, whereas eq'ing correlated signals (e.g. (starts really basic, but gets a little deeper as it goes)
Maybe this is obvious to everyone else, but: having recently been clued in to the notion that, when processing a stereo channel in mid/side encoding, one should strongly consider linear-phase eq, I watched this truly excellent video on minimum vs.
0 kommentar(er)
